skip to main |
skip to sidebar
New Belgium
2010 La Folie(Aged in French oak barrels) ABV 6%
Color: Deep, dark, reddish-brown.
Aroma: Sharp, intense sour cherry mixed with some burnt caramel and barnyard funk.
Flavor: Creamy, rich and intensely sour with some subtle creamy woodiness.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): N/A (SOUR!)
Finish: Sour cherries with some chalky tannins.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Fantastic
Russian River Supplication
(Aged in Pinot Noir barrels with sour cherries) ABV 7%
Color: Hazy orange.
Aroma: Floral and perfumy with some pumpkin pie spices and a ton of funkiness.
Flavor: Not nearly as sour as NB, creamy tart lemon.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): N/A
Finish: Bitter (but not like hop bitterness) and slightly metallic.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good
Split decision: Both of these sours are highly regarded among beer connoisseurs so it was bound to be a good fight. As expected, they both assaulted our senses with aromas and flavors that are very different than your average malt/hop combination. After 10 grueling rounds, Ellen chose the Supplication and I chose the La Folie.
For Ellen it came down to sourness (disclaimer: she is not a big fan of sour beers). The La Folie is wicked, face-contorting, tongue-stinging, sour! The Supplication exhibits mild sourness by comparison, so it is not surprising that she chose it.
While I agreed that the La Folie was more sour, I thought that the burnt caramel and wood notes complemented the sourness and created a seriously delicious combination. I also detected some metallic notes in the finish of the Supplication that Ellen wasn't as sensitive to.
One thing that stood out to both of us was that the La Folie had sour cherry notes even though it didn't spend any time aging with cherries, while the Supplication displayed no cherries despite being aged with them. Curious.
If you haven't tried a sour beer, you owe it to yourself and your palate to do so. A good sour will totally obliterate your perception about what a beer can be.
In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the New Belgium Brewery.
Full Sail Hop Pursuit
Extra Pale AleABV 6% IBU 55
Color: Hazy yellow.
Aroma: Sweet and malty with a small dose of citrus hops. Ellen detected some rose aromas.
Flavor: Sweet citrus, more orange than grapefruit with nice malt backbone, not very bitter.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Balanced.
Finish: Slight citrus bitterness and a bit of grassiness.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Mediocre +
Hood Canal Brewing
Dosewallips Special Ale ABV ?% IBU ?
Color: Crystal clear light orange.
Aroma: Stinky cheese, sweet malts and butter, like a buttered popcorn jelly belly.
Flavor: Slightly sweet and malty with absolutely zero hoppiness.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Malty.
Finish: Buttery and metallic.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Bad
Winner by unanimous decision: Full Sail.
This one wasn't even close. The Dosewallips started the fight by spitting up a bit (foaming over) when I popped the cap and it was downhill from there. The beer was likely infected with diacetyl, a naturally occurring by-product of beer fermentation that can really mess up a beer if it becomes too prominent. At high levels, it gives beer a buttery aroma and flavor that can be downright nasty. We definitely detected butter in the Dosewallips and it was not pleasant. We tried to give it a chance, Lord knows we tried, but ultimately we had to admit that it was a bad beer. As a matter of fact, it is the first beer that we have rated "bad" in six months of doing battles. A dubious honor to be sure.
The Hop Pursuit was not a great beer, but all it really had to do was show up and it was guaranteed a victory. Against stiffer competition it might not have fared so well. The name was a bit misleading, as it didn't really have a prominent hop aroma or bitterness. It may have been pursuing hops, but it sure wasn't catching any.
And finally, what the hell is an Extra Pale Ale? Is it supposed to be something between a Pale Ale and an IPA? Is it an ESB (Extra Special Bitter) in disguise? Is it a marketing gimmick? My half-hearted Google search yielded no answers. Anyone want to fill me in?
Klamath Basin
Drop Dead Red AleABV 5.9%
Color: Cranberry red.
Aroma: Piney hops, sweet, bready malts.
Flavor: Starts malty sweet then moves into a soapy, minerally flavor.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy.
Finish: Bitter, piney and minerally.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Mediocre +
Southern Oregon Brewing
Woodshed Red Ale ABV 6.3%
Color: Orange/red.
Aroma: Sweet (almost like wort) and floral with some smoky roasted malts.
Flavor: Citrus hops.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy.
Finish: Long lasting citrus bitterness with a touch of dried grains.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good
Winner by unanimous decision:
Southern Oregon Brewing.
On our recent trip to southern Oregon we found tons of bottles just itching for a fight. These two red ales seemed particularly feisty, so we threw them both in the ring to see what they were made of. Turns out, they were both made of water, hops, barley and yeast, but, in our opinion, the SOB was superior.
But before we get into the details, what the hell is a red ale? Well, to be extremely simplistic, it is an ale that is reddish in color. Other than that, red ales don't really have any specific style guidelines. Brewers are free to interpret red ales in any way they choose. Some choose to make them sweet and malty like an amber, while others choose to ramp up the hops and make them into reddish IPAs.
If we were judging by color alone, the Klamath Falls would have won easily. It had a gorgeous red color reminiscent of cranberry juice. It also had a great nose — a good combination of piney hops and sweet malts. Unfortunately, the flavor did not follow suit. The piney hop flavor was so intense that it tasted minerally and almost soapy. The SOB wasn't as flashy in the glass, but it made up for its duller red color with a more complex flavor profile, offering roasty notes along with the floral and citrus hops.
Now is when I should make a joke about the Drop Dead being taken behind the Woodshed and taught a lesson, but I just can't bring myself to do it. Instead, I will conclude by recommending that you find time in your busy schedules to check out southern Oregon — it's a beautiful area that offers plenty of craft beer to go along with the myriad of recreational activities.
Stone Brewing
Oaked Arrogant Bastard AleABV 7.2% IBU Classified
Color: Brownish red.
Aroma: Roasted sweet malts and spicy, piney hops.
Flavor: Starts with a rich, sugary molasses, then moves into intense bitter hoppiness.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy.
Finish: Intensely bitter, like bitter greens. Also slightly tannic (could it be from the oak aging?)
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good +
Dogfish Head Burton Baton ABV 10% IBU 70
Color: Bright, clear orange.
Aroma: Massive piney hop blast.
Flavor: Citrusy hop syrup.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Malty.
Finish: Very sweet with orange flower water notes and mild hop bitterness.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Fantastic.
Winner by unanimous decision: Dogfish Head.
What a battle! Both of these beers are big, strong, bold and brash and the fight was very evenly matched. But, as you might expect, the Arrogant one got cocky and started showboating. Baton, on the other hand, maintained focus and leveled the Bastard in the 9th round.
Both of these beers are well worth your attention. They both have intense aromas, but the Burton Baton's is almost absurd. If you take a big enough whiff you kind of partially pass out and then get a slight headache, but before you know it, you're going back for another sniff.
The most interesting distinction we found between the two was that the Bastard had a lot of sweetness in the aroma but tasted quite hoppy while the Baton smelled hoppier but tasted sweet. The other thing to note was that despite the wood aging, neither of us detected any wood flavors or aromas in the beers.
In the end, it came down to the finish. The finish on the Bastard was wicked bitter and lingered a bit too long. The finish on the Baton, however, was delightfully rich and sweet with a mellow bitterness that was just enough to complement the sweet. To us, the Baton is definitely more of a dessert beer, perfect for slow sipping by the campfire while you contemplate the nature of hops and the meaning of wort.
Sierra Nevada Summerfest LagerABV 5%
Color: Crystal clear, bright, sunny yellow.
Aroma: Clean, floral, some dry grains, lemon and distinct Belgian yeast notes (spicy cloves).
Flavor: Sweet and citrusy, like grapefruit sprinkled with sugar.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy
Finish: Mild citrus hoppy bitterness.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good
New Belgium Skinny Dip
(brewed with Kaffir Lime Leaf) ABV 4.2%
Color: Crystal clear, amber orange.
Aroma: Floral hops and some caramel malts.
Flavor: Thin, sweet lemon water.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Malty
Finish: Not much, just sort of disappears.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Mediocre
Winner by unanimous decision: Summerfest.
It may be hard for those of us in the Northwest to believe, but summer starts in four days. If you dig the hot weather, spring has been a serious disappointment. It hasn't hit 75º yet this year in Seattle, but when it does, you'll want to have a cold craft beer in your hand to celebrate the occasion.
In an attempt to kick-start the hot weather we threw two summer seasonals into the ring and let them have at it. The Summerfest didn't mess around. It dropped the Skinny in the second round with a devastating combination of crisp, refreshing flavor and surprising complexity. Honestly, we suspect that the Skinny Dip didn't train hard enough for this fight. It tasted like a thin amber ale and the kaffir lime leaf was hardly detectable. The Summerfest, on the other hand, was a fantastic summer sipper. It was light and crisp enough to quaff, but also offered ample flavor and complexity to tickle your taste buds.
Sierra Nevada will be pouring their Summerfest at the 2010 Washington Brewers Festival this weekend. If you're smart, you'll drop all of your previous plans and head out to the festival for some Summerfest and hopefully some sun to go along with it.
In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the New Belgium Brewery.
Grieskirchner WeisseABV 5.1%
Color: Hazy light orangish yellow.
Aroma: Phenolic yeast aromas (band-aid, banana).
Flavor: Smooth, creamy, refreshing and lemony.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Balanced.
Finish: Grain and cloves.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good +
Pike Dry Wit ABV 5.0%
Color: Almost the exact same color but less hazy.
Aroma: Cardamom, coriander, cheese rind.
Flavor: More of the same — cardamom and coriander.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Balanced.
Finish: Grain with some bitterness and tannins, like an over-steeped tea.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good -
Winner by unanimous decision: Grieskirchner.
In honor of the World Cup starting tomorrow we thought we'd stage an international battle. Unfortunately, we could not procure any English wheat beer to battle the Pike Wit. Instead we had to settle for an Austrian Weissbeer from a brewery with a name that is nearly unpronounceable. Sure, Austria isn't actually in the World Cup, but based on this battle it's apparent that they make up for their lack of futbol talent with some serious beer-making talent.
It wasn't exactly a "fair" fight, as the Pike Wit is an interpretation of a Belgian-style witbier (flavored with orange peel, coriander and other spices), while the Grieskirchner is made in a German Hefeweizen style. Sure, they are both made with wheat, but aside from that they vary greatly in aroma and flavor. However, fights don't have to be fair — the battle goes on without regard to categorization or style. And in this battle, the one that starts with a G was clearly the winner. Its smooth, creamy mouthfeel and classic hefeweizen yeast characteristics made it a joy to drink. If the weather in Seattle ever gets hot again (big "if"), this would be an excellent beer for a BBQ or picnic. The Pike, on the other hand seemed harsh in comparison. The coriander and other spices came through a bit too much and it finished with a strange tea-like bitterness. It wasn't a bad beer (and actually, it might go quite well with Indian food or other boldly spiced fare), but it just didn't match up well with the Austrian Weisse.
And finally, we'll answer the question you've all been waiting for, "Does this mean that the US will lose to England in the first game of the World Cup?" I hate to break it to you, but the results of the battles on this blog have yet to provide any meaningful sports predictions. However, if you do plan to have a beer while watching the game we suggest that you have two: Grieskirchner during the first half and Pike during the second.
In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the Pike Brewery.
Deschutes Hop in the Dark CDA
(Cascadian Dark Ale) ABV 6.5% IBU 70
Color: Pitch black.
Aroma: Crazy combination of roasted malt and intense hops, like coffee candy infused with hops.
Flavor: Creamy, sweet and rich with nice hop bitterness. Coffee with sugar and lemon juice.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy.
Finish: Bitter coffee.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Fantastic
Laughing Dog Dogzilla Black IPA ABV 6.9% IBU 69
Color: Dark ruby red.
Aroma: Pine sap hoppiness with some smoky roasted malts and sweet caramel.
Flavor: Big citrus hops with plenty of sweet malts to back it up.Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy.
Finish: Citrus peel.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad): Good +
Winner by unanimous decision: Deschutes.
Cascadian Dark Ale vs. Black IPA? Well, actually they both fall into the same style category. Problem is, no one can decide on what to call it. Basically these are both beers that have the appearance of a dark stout or porter, but the flavor of a hoppy India Pale Ale. But, honestly, who cares what you call them — are they good? That's the important question.
Based on these two examples the answer is an emphatic "yes!" Both of these beers are excellent but in totally different ways. The Dogzilla focuses more on the hoppy side of the style while the Hop in the Dark leans more toward the roasted malts/coffee flavor and aroma. Hopheads will LOVE the Dogzilla. It's bold and unapologetically hoppy. However, the Hop in the Dark would just not be denied. From its gorgeous pitch black color to its mellow coffee finish it is an engaging beer that is creamy, hoppy, roasty and delicious. Do yourself a favor and try both of these beers. They both are fun interpretations of an emerging style that will challenge your preconceptions about what beer should taste like. Extra Credit: The Hop in the Dark has a great label designed by Casey Burns.
It features a night scene that implies some skinny dipping. But look back there in the background, against the black of the mountain. Are those hazy letters back there? Could it be a subliminal message? Looks like it to us, but we just can't make it out.
Also, underneath the cap of the Hop in the Dark was a simple message: Bravely Done. If that's what bravery is all about, sign us up. We're bound to be heroes!
In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the Deschutes Brewery.
Posts
