Friday, June 25, 2010

Oak-Aged Ales — Stone vs. Dogfish Head



Stone Brewing
Oaked Arrogant Bastard Ale

ABV 7.2% IBU Classified

Color:
Brownish red.
Aroma:
Roasted sweet malts and spicy, piney hops.
Flavor:
Starts with a rich, sugary molasses, then moves into intense bitter hoppiness.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced):
Hoppy.
Finish:
Intensely bitter, like bitter greens. Also slightly tannic (could it be from the oak aging?)
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Good +

Dogfish Head Burton Baton
ABV 10% IBU 70

Color:
Bright, clear orange.
Aroma:
Massive piney hop blast.
Flavor:
Citrusy hop syrup.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Malty.
Finish:
Very sweet with orange flower water notes and mild hop bitterness.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Fantastic.

Winner by unanimous decision
: Dogfish Head.
What a battle! Both of these beers are big, strong, bold and brash and the fight was very evenly matched. But, as you might expect, the Arrogant one got cocky and started showboating. Baton, on the other hand, maintained focus and leveled the Bastard in the 9th round.

Both of these beers are well worth your attention. They both have intense aromas, but the Burton Baton's is almost absurd. If you take a big enough whiff you kind of partially pass out and then get a slight headache, but before you know it, you're going back for another sniff.

The most interesting distinction we found between the two was that the Bastard had a lot of sweetness in the aroma but tasted quite hoppy while the Baton smelled hoppier but tasted sweet. The other thing to note was that despite the wood aging, neither of us detected any wood flavors or aromas in the beers.

In the end, it came down to the finish. The finish on the Bastard was wicked bitter and lingered a bit too long. The finish on the Baton, however, was delightfully rich and sweet with a mellow bitterness that was just enough to complement the sweet. To us, the Baton is definitely more of a dessert beer, perfect for slow sipping by the campfire while you contemplate the nature of hops and the meaning of wort.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Summer Beers — Sierra Nevada vs. New Belgium



Sierra Nevada Summerfest Lager

ABV 5%

Color:
Crystal clear, bright, sunny yellow.
Aroma:
Clean, floral, some dry grains, lemon and distinct Belgian yeast notes (spicy cloves).
Flavor:
Sweet and citrusy, like grapefruit sprinkled with sugar.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced):
Hoppy
Finish:
Mild citrus hoppy bitterness.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Good

New Belgium Skinny Dip
(brewed with Kaffir Lime Leaf)
ABV 4.2%

Color:
Crystal clear, amber orange.
Aroma:
Floral hops and some caramel malts.
Flavor:
Thin, sweet lemon water.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Malty
Finish:
Not much, just sort of disappears.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Mediocre

Winner by unanimous decision
: Summerfest.
It may be hard for those of us in the Northwest to believe, but summer starts in four days. If you dig the hot weather, spring has been a serious disappointment. It hasn't hit 75º yet this year in Seattle, but when it does, you'll want to have a cold craft beer in your hand to celebrate the occasion.

In an attempt to kick-start the hot weather we threw two summer seasonals
into the ring and let them have at it. The Summerfest didn't mess around. It dropped the Skinny in the second round with a devastating combination of crisp, refreshing flavor and surprising complexity. Honestly, we suspect that the Skinny Dip didn't train hard enough for this fight. It tasted like a thin amber ale and the kaffir lime leaf was hardly detectable. The Summerfest, on the other hand, was a fantastic summer sipper. It was light and crisp enough to quaff, but also offered ample flavor and complexity to tickle your taste buds.

Sierra Nevada will be pouring their Summerfest at the 2010 Washington Brewers Festival this weekend. If you're smart, you'll drop all of your previous plans and head out to the festival for some Summerfest and hopefully some sun to go along with it.

In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the New Belgium Brewery.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Wheat Beers — Grieskirchner vs. Pike



Grieskirchner Weisse
ABV 5.1%

Color:
Hazy light orangish yellow.
Aroma:
Phenolic yeast aromas (band-aid, banana).
Flavor:
Smooth, creamy, refreshing and lemony.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced):
Balanced.
Finish:
Grain and cloves.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Good +

Pike Dry Wit
ABV 5.0%

Color:
Almost the exact same color but less hazy.
Aroma:
Cardamom, coriander, cheese rind.
Flavor:
More of the same — cardamom and coriander.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Balanced.
Finish:
Grain with some bitterness and tannins, like an over-steeped tea.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Good -

Winner by unanimous decision
: Grieskirchner.
In honor of the World Cup starting tomorrow we thought we'd stage an international battle. Unfortunately, we could not procure any English wheat beer to battle the Pike Wit. Instead we had to settle for an Austrian Weissbeer from a brewery with a name that is nearly unpronounceable. Sure, Austria isn't actually in the World Cup, but based on this battle it's apparent that they make up for their lack of futbol talent with some serious beer-making talent.

It wasn't exactly a "fair" fight, as the Pike Wit is an interpretation of a Belgian-style witbier (flavored with orange peel, coriander and other spices), while the
Grieskirchner is made in a German Hefeweizen style. Sure, they are both made with wheat, but aside from that they vary greatly in aroma and flavor. However, fights don't have to be fair — the battle goes on without regard to categorization or style. And in this battle, the one that starts with a G was clearly the winner. Its smooth, creamy mouthfeel and classic hefeweizen yeast characteristics made it a joy to drink. If the weather in Seattle ever gets hot again (big "if"), this would be an excellent beer for a BBQ or picnic. The Pike, on the other hand seemed harsh in comparison. The coriander and other spices came through a bit too much and it finished with a strange tea-like bitterness. It wasn't a bad beer (and actually, it might go quite well with Indian food or other boldly spiced fare), but it just didn't match up well with the Austrian Weisse.

And finally, we'll answer the question you've all been waiting for, "Does this mean that the US will lose to England in the first game of the World Cup?" I hate to break it to you, but the results of the battles on this blog have yet to provide any meaningful sports predictions. However, if you do plan to have a beer while watching the game we suggest that you have two:
Grieskirchner during the first half and Pike during the second.

In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the Pike Brewery.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Cascadian Dark Ales — Deschutes vs. Laughing Dog



Deschutes Hop in the Dark CDA
(Cascadian Dark Ale)
ABV 6.5% IBU 70

Color:
Pitch black.
Aroma:
Crazy combination of roasted malt and intense hops, like coffee candy infused with hops.
Flavor:
Creamy, sweet and rich with nice hop bitterness. Coffee with sugar and lemon juice.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced):
Hoppy.
Finish:
Bitter coffee.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Fantastic

Laughing Dog Dogzilla Black IPA
ABV 6.9% IBU 69

Color:
Dark ruby red.
Aroma:
Pine sap hoppiness with some smoky roasted malts and sweet caramel.
Flavor:
Big citrus hops with plenty of sweet malts to back it up.
Hops vs. Malts (Hoppy, Malty or Balanced): Hoppy.
Finish:
Citrus peel.
Overall (Fantastic, Good, Mediocre or Bad):
Good +

Winner by unanimous decision
: Deschutes.
Cascadian Dark Ale vs. Black IPA? Well, actually they both fall into the same style category. Problem is, no one can decide on what to call it. Basically these are both beers that have the appearance of a dark stout or porter, but the flavor of a hoppy India Pale Ale. But, honestly, who cares what you call them — are they good? That's the important question.

Based on these two examples the answer is an emphatic "yes!" Both of these beers are excellent but in totally different ways. The Dogzilla focuses more on the hoppy side of the style while the Hop in the Dark leans more toward the roasted malts/coffee flavor and aroma. Hopheads will LOVE the Dogzilla. It's bold and unapologetically hoppy. However, the Hop in the Dark would just not be denied. From its gorgeous pitch black color to its mellow coffee finish it is an engaging beer that is creamy, hoppy, roasty and delicious. Do yourself a favor and try both of these beers. They both are fun interpretations of an emerging style that will challenge your preconceptions about what beer should taste like.


Extra Credit: The Hop in the Dark has a great label designed by Casey Burns. It features a night scene that implies some skinny dipping. But look back there in the background, against the black of the mountain. Are those hazy letters back there? Could it be a subliminal message? Looks like it to us, but we just can't make it out.

Also, underneath the cap of the Hop in the Dark was a simple message: Bravely Done. If that's what bravery is all about, sign us up. We're bound to be heroes!

In the interest of full disclosure to satisfy the FTC’s law, this battle features a sample bottle received from the Deschutes Brewery.